Atom x5-Z8330
VS
Ryzen 9 5900X

Atom x5-Z8330 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel

Atom x5-Z8330

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 1.92 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom x5-Z8330 is positioned at rank #778 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-Z8330

#766
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1145%
#767
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1128%
#768
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1036%
#769
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1031%
#770
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1021%
#772
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
986%
#773
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
946%
#774
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
944%
#775
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
919%
#778
Atom x5-Z8330
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#790
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 5900X

#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
105%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
104%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
103%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
103%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
103%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
103%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
102%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
102%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
102%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
101%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
101%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
101%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
101%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
100%
#155
Core i7-13700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
100%
#156
Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $350
100%
#157
Core i7-13700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $345
100%
#158
Core i5-13600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
99%
#159
Ryzen 5 3400GE
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
99%
#160
Core i7-12700F
MSRP: $314|Avg: $275
99%
#161
Core i5-9400
MSRP: $192|Avg: $85
99%
#162
Core i3-13100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $128
99%
#163
Core i9-10910
MSRP: $488|Avg: $200
96%
#164
Core i5-14600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
96%
#165
Core i5-11500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
95%
#166
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#167
Ryzen 3 8300GE
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
95%
#168
Core i3-13100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $122
94%
#169
Core i5-10600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $110
94%
#170
Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $67
94%
#171
Core Ultra 9 285
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 9 5900X (2020) utilizes 7 nm, 12 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom x5-Z8330Ryzen 9 5900X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Atom x5-Z8330 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3L-RS 1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom x5-Z8330Ryzen 9 5900X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x5-Z8330 and Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel

Atom x5-Z8330

The Atom x5-Z8330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.92 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Memory support: DDR3L-RS 1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,025 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Processing Power

The Atom x5-Z8330 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.92 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8330 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 85.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 1.44 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Atom x5-Z8330 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8330 scores 1,025 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 189.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-Z8330 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

FeatureAtom x5-Z8330Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock
1.92 GHz
4.8 GHz+150%
Base Clock
1.44 GHz
3.7 GHz+157%
L3 Cache
0 kB
64 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture
Airmont (2016)
Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
1,025
38,955+3700%
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,888
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-RS 1600 on the Atom x5-Z8330 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x5-Z8330) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 1 (Atom x5-Z8330) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 23 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x5-Z8330) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

FeatureAtom x5-Z8330Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-RS 1600
DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
128 GB+6300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
1
24+2300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-Z8330) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Atom x5-Z8330 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

FeatureAtom x5-Z8330Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation