Atom x7-Z8700
VS
Athlon Neo X2 L335

Atom x7-Z8700 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335

Intel

Atom x7-Z8700

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 2.4 GHz2015
VS
AMD

Athlon Neo X2 L335

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon Neo X2 L335

#932
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1763%
#933
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1737%
#934
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1595%
#935
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1588%
#936
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1573%
#938
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1519%
#939
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1457%
#940
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1454%
#941
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1415%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
100%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#949
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
97%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
97%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7-Z8700 (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom x7-Z8700Athlon Neo X2 L335
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Congo (2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 (2009) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom x7-Z8700Athlon Neo X2 L335
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7-Z8700 and Athlon Neo X2 L335

Intel

Atom x7-Z8700

The Atom x7-Z8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,325 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon Neo X2 L335

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,331 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Atom x7-Z8700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom x7-Z8700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8700 versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — a 40% clock advantage for the Atom x7-Z8700. The Atom x7-Z8700 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses Congo (2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-Z8700 scores 1,325 against the Athlon Neo X2 L335's 1,331 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L335.

FeatureAtom x7-Z8700Athlon Neo X2 L335
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+50%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Congo (2009)
PassMark
1,325
1,331
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-Z8700 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 uses ASB1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1600 on the Atom x7-Z8700 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon Neo X2 L335 — the Atom x7-Z8700 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x7-Z8700 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 2 (Atom x7-Z8700) vs 0 (Athlon Neo X2 L335) — the Atom x7-Z8700 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x7-Z8700) and AMD ASB1 (Athlon Neo X2 L335).

FeatureAtom x7-Z8700Athlon Neo X2 L335
Socket
UTFCBGA1380
ASB1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1600+50%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
2
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom x7-Z8700 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Athlon Neo X2 L335 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom x7-Z8700Athlon Neo X2 L335
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)