Atom x7-Z8750 vs Core i3-4012Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs Core i3-4012Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs Core i3-4012Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7-Z8750

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4012Y

2013

Why buy it

✅500% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 2) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,278 vs 1,294).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7-Z8750 better than Core i3-4012Y?

Yes. Atom x7-Z8750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x7-Z8750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 37 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7-Z8750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7-Z8750 still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7-Z8750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7-Z8750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom x7-Z8750 vs Core i3-4012Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7-Z8750

The Atom x7-Z8750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.56 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,294 points. Launch price was $37.

Core i3-4012Y

The Core i3-4012Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,278 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7-Z8750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4012Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-Z8750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.56 GHz on the Atom x7-Z8750 versus 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-4012Y — a 52.2% clock advantage for the Atom x7-Z8750 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Atom x7-Z8750 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-4012Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-Z8750 scores 1,294 against the Core i3-4012Y's 1,278 — a 1.2% lead for the Atom x7-Z8750. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x7-Z8750 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4012Y.

Feature	Atom x7-Z8750	Core i3-4012Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.56 GHz+71%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+7%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Cherry Trail (2015−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,294+1%	1,278
Geekbench 6 Single	—	485
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	988

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7-Z8750 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4012Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4012Y supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 2 (Atom x7-Z8750) vs 12 (Core i3-4012Y) — the Core i3-4012Y offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom x7-Z8750) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i3-4012Y).

Feature	Atom x7-Z8750	Core i3-4012Y
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	2	12+500%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7-Z8750) / VT-x / EPT (Core i3-4012Y). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x7-Z8750) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4012Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4012Y targets Low Power.

Feature	Atom x7-Z8750	Core i3-4012Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)	Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x / EPT
Target Use	—	Low Power