PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7211E vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7211E vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7211E

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (16EU), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,553 vs 13,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +203.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x7211E.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Atom x7211E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Atom x7211E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7211E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Atom x7211E?

Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 203.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 410.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 203.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 410.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 203.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7211E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7211E vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7211E

The Atom x7211E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7211E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211E versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 29.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Atom x7211E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211E scores 2,553 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 134.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211E vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.

Feature	Atom x7211E	Core i5-10400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.3 GHz+34%
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.9 GHz+190%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Gracemont (2023)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	2,553	13,029+410%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	8,191
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,783

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7211E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211E versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Atom x7211E supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211E) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7211E) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211E) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).

Feature	Atom x7211E	Core i5-10400F
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+80%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	128 GB+700%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	9	16+78%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7211E) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Atom x7211E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.