Atom x7211E vs Core i7-7Y75

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7211E vs Core i7-7Y75 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7211E vs Core i7-7Y75: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7211E

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1515 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (16EU), while Core i7-7Y75 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌33.3% higher power demand at 6W vs 4.5W.

Core i7-7Y75

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 6W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,534 vs 2,553).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $393 MSRP, while Atom x7211E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1515, while Atom x7211E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7211E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7Y75 better than Atom x7211E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-7Y75 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7211E pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Atom x7211E also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7211E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7Y75 is the better buy right now. Core i7-7Y75 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $393 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Atom x7211E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7211E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1515, 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7211E vs Core i7-7Y75 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7211E

The Atom x7211E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-7Y75

The Core i7-7Y75 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,534 points. Launch price was $393.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7211E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-7Y75's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211E versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-7Y75 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-7Y75 (base: 1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Atom x7211E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211E scores 2,553 against the Core i7-7Y75's 2,534 — a 0.7% lead for the Atom x7211E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211E vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7Y75.

Feature	Atom x7211E	Core i7-7Y75
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+300%	512 kB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Gracemont (2023)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,553	2,534

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7211E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-7Y75 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x7211E	Core i7-7Y75
Socket	FCBGA1744	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	9	—