
Atom x7211E

Ryzen 7 3700X
Atom x7211E vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7211E vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7211E vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7211E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (16EU), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,553 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +332.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Atom x7211E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Atom x7211E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7211E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Atom x7211E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7211E vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7211E
The Atom x7211E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,553 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Atom x7211E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211E versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Atom x7211E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7211E scores 2,553 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 159.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7211E vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Atom x7211E | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+260% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 32 MB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Gracemont (2023) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 2,553 | 22,430+779% |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7211E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7211E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Atom x7211E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7211E) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7211E) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 15 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7211E) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Atom x7211E | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 24+167% |
Advanced Features
The Atom x7211E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom x7211E | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (16EU) | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













