Atom x7405C
VS
Core i3-8100T

Atom x7405C vs Core i3-8100T

Intel

Atom x7405C

4 Cores4 Thrd12 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core i3-8100T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom x7405C is positioned at rank #180 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7405C

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
100%
#168
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
354%
#169
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
349%
#170
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
320%
#171
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
319%
#172
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
316%
#174
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
305%
#175
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
293%
#176
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
292%
#177
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
284%
#180
Atom x7405C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#193
Pentium Gold 4417U
MSRP: $161|Avg: N/A
98%
#195
Atom N475
MSRP: $75|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-8100T

#198
Core i3-9350KF
MSRP: $173|Avg: $80
107%
#199
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
MSRP: $220|Avg: $220
106%
#200
Core i3-9300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $75
106%
#201
Ryzen 7 3800XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
106%
#202
Core i5-11400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $140
104%
#203
Core i3-10305
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
103%
#204
Core i3-9320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $80
103%
#205
Core i3-10105
MSRP: $122|Avg: $90
103%
#206
Core i3-13100E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
103%
#207
Core i9-13900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $536
102%
#208
Processor 300
MSRP: $82|Avg: $80
102%
#209
Ryzen 5 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $145
102%
#210
Ryzen 5 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $80
102%
#211
Core i9-14900KS
MSRP: $749|Avg: $670
101%
#212
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $384
100%
#213
Core i3-8100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
100%
#214
Core i7-13700E
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
100%
#215
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
MSRP: $430|Avg: $270
100%
#216
Core i7-9700
MSRP: $333|Avg: $150
99%
#217
Core i5-13500TE
MSRP: $235|Avg: $250
98%
#218
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
MSRP: $294|Avg: $76
98%
#219
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#220
Athlon PRO 300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#221
Athlon Gold 3150G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
97%
#222
Core i7-9800X
MSRP: $589|Avg: $210
97%
#223
Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $235
96%
#224
Ryzen 9 5900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $395
96%
#225
Ryzen 5 7600X3D
MSRP: $299|Avg: $300
96%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
59%
#226
Core i5-14500T
MSRP: $232|Avg: $267
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7405C (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom x7405CCore i3-8100T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($59)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-8100T (2018) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom x7405CCore i3-8100T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($59)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7405C and Core i3-8100T

Intel

Atom x7405C

The Atom x7405C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 5,218 points. Launch price was $57.

Intel

Core i3-8100T

The Core i3-8100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 5,257 points. Launch price was $117.

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7405C and Core i3-8100T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7405C versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-8100T — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Atom x7405C (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Atom x7405C uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-8100T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7405C scores 5,218 against the Core i3-8100T's 5,257 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-8100T. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom x7405CCore i3-8100T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+10%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3.1 GHz+82%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
5,218
5,257
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7405C uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-8100T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7405C versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8100T — the Atom x7405C supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-8100T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7405C) vs 2 (Core i3-8100T). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7405C) vs 16 (Core i3-8100T) — the Core i3-8100T offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureAtom x7405CCore i3-8100T
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800+25%
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
9
16+78%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7405C) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100T). Both include integrated graphics Intel UHD Graphics (Atom x7405C) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-8100T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8100T targets Desktop.

FeatureAtom x7405CCore i3-8100T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop