Atom x7405C vs Core i7-3610QE
Atom x7405C
Core i7-3610QE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x7405C is positioned at rank 180 and the Core i7-3610QE is on rank 945, so the Atom x7405C offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7405C
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3610QE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom x7405C | Core i7-3610QE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($105) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom x7405C | Core i7-3610QE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($105) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7405C and Core i7-3610QE
Atom x7405C
The Atom x7405C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 5,218 points. Launch price was $57.
Core i7-3610QE
The Core i7-3610QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,234 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Atom x7405C packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3610QE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7405C versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QE — a 3% clock advantage for the Atom x7405C (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Atom x7405C uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-3610QE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7405C scores 5,218 against the Core i7-3610QE's 5,234 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-3610QE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7405C vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3610QE.
| Feature | Atom x7405C | Core i7-3610QE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.3 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 6144 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 5,218 | 5,234 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7405C uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-3610QE uses G2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7405C versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3610QE — the Atom x7405C supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3610QE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7405C) vs 2 (Core i7-3610QE). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7405C) vs 16 (Core i7-3610QE) — the Core i7-3610QE offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Atom x7405C | Core i7-3610QE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | G2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+67% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 16+78% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7405C) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3610QE). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (Atom x7405C) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3610QE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3610QE targets Mobile.
| Feature | Atom x7405C | Core i7-3610QE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom x7405C and Core i7-3610QE
