Atom x7405C vs Core i7-4702MQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7405C vs Core i7-4702MQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7405C vs Core i7-4702MQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7405C

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 12W instead of 37W, a 25W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of PGA946 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4702MQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-4702MQ

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅77.8% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,187 vs 5,218).
❌Launch MSRP is still $383 MSRP, while Atom x7405C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌208.3% higher power demand at 37W vs 12W.
❌Older platform position on PGA946, while Atom x7405C moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7405C better than Core i7-4702MQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4702MQ is ahead with a 21.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7405C pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core i7-4702MQ also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7405C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7405C is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom x7405C comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $383 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. Core i7-4702MQ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (13.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA946.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7405C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2013), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of PGA946, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7405C vs Core i7-4702MQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7405C

The Atom x7405C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 5,218 points. Launch price was $57.

Core i7-4702MQ

The Core i7-4702MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,187 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7405C packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-4702MQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7405C versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4702MQ — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Atom x7405C (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Atom x7405C uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-4702MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7405C scores 5,218 against the Core i7-4702MQ's 5,187 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom x7405C. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7405C vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4702MQ.

Feature	Atom x7405C	Core i7-4702MQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.2 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	5,218	5,187
Geekbench 6 Single	—	965
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,180

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7405C uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-4702MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7405C versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4702MQ — the Atom x7405C supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-4702MQ supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7405C) vs 2 (Core i7-4702MQ). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7405C) vs 16 (Core i7-4702MQ) — the Core i7-4702MQ offers 7 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7405C) and HM86,QM87 (Core i7-4702MQ).

Feature	Atom x7405C	Core i7-4702MQ
Socket	FCBGA1264	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+200%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	9	16+78%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7405C) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4702MQ). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (Atom x7405C) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i7-4702MQ) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4702MQ targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-4702MQ rivals Ryzen 7 3750H.