
Atom x7405C

Core i5-12400F
Atom x7405C vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7405C vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7405C vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7405C
2024Why buy it
- β Draws 12W instead of 65W, a 53W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (5,218 vs 19,532).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 18 MB).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +138.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
- β 122.2% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x7405C.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Atom x7405C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β441.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 12W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Atom x7405C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Atom x7405C?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7405C vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7405C
The Atom x7405C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024β2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 5,218 points. Launch price was $57.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The Atom x7405C packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7405C versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F β a 25.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Atom x7405C uses the Amston Lake (2024β2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7405C scores 5,218 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 β a 115.7% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7405C vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | Atom x7405C | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.5 GHz+47% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 18 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024β2025) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 5,218 | 19,532+274% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7405C uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7405C) vs 2 (Core i5-12400F). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7405C) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) β the Core i5-12400F offers 11 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7405C) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | Atom x7405C | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 20+122% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7405C) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The Atom x7405C includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Atom x7405C | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | β |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Gaming Performance/Value |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













