Atom Z2560 vs E1-2500

Atom Z2560 vs E1-2500 Performance Spectrum

Atom Z2560

2 / 4

1,056

+0.4%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

1,052

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z2560 vs E1-2500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z2560 vs E1-2500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z2560

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 15W, a 12W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with PowerVR SGX544MP2, while E1-2500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

E1-2500

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,052 vs 1,056).
❌400% higher power demand at 15W vs 3W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z2560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z2560 better than E1-2500?

Yes. Atom Z2560 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom Z2560 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z2560 still makes the most sense overall. Atom Z2560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z2560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom Z2560 vs E1-2500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z2560

The Atom Z2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Clovertrail (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

E1-2500

The E1-2500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,052 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z2560 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the E1-2500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom Z2560 versus 1.4 GHz on the E1-2500 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Atom Z2560. The Atom Z2560 uses the Clovertrail (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the E1-2500 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z2560 scores 1,056 against the E1-2500's 1,052 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom Z2560. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom Z2560	E1-2500
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz+14%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1024 kB+100%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Clovertrail (2013)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,056	1,052

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z2560 uses the FC-MB4760 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E1-2500 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.