Atom Z2560 vs E2-3200

Atom Z2560 vs E2-3200 Performance Spectrum

Atom Z2560

2 / 4

1,056

+0.6%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

1,050

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z2560 vs E2-3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z2560 vs E2-3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z2560

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with PowerVR SGX544MP2, while E2-3200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

E2-3200

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,050 vs 1,056).
❌2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z2560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z2560 better than E2-3200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, E2-3200 is ahead with a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2560 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z2560 still makes the most sense overall. Atom Z2560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z2560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom Z2560 vs E2-3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z2560

The Atom Z2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Clovertrail (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

E2-3200

The E2-3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z2560 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the E2-3200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom Z2560 versus 2.4 GHz on the E2-3200 — a 40% clock advantage for the E2-3200. The Atom Z2560 uses the Clovertrail (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the E2-3200 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z2560 scores 1,056 against the E2-3200's 1,050 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom Z2560. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom Z2560	E2-3200
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.4 GHz+50%
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Clovertrail (2013)	Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark	1,056	1,050

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z2560 uses the FC-MB4760 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-3200 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.