Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-7167U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-7167U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-7167U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3740

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-7167U

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom Z3740 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,368 vs 3,380).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z3740 better than Core i3-7167U?

Yes. Atom Z3740 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom Z3740 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3740 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z3740 still makes the most sense overall. Atom Z3740 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7167U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom Z3740 vs Core i3-7167U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3740

The Atom Z3740 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,380 points. Launch price was $32.

Core i3-7167U

The Core i3-7167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,368 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z3740 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7167U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom Z3740 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Atom Z3740 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7167U — a 40.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-7167U (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Atom Z3740 uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-7167U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3740 scores 3,380 against the Core i3-7167U's 3,368 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom Z3740. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom Z3740 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7167U.

Feature	Atom Z3740	Core i3-7167U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz	2.8 GHz+51%
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	2.8 GHz+111%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,380	3,368

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3740 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-7167U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1066 on the Atom Z3740 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-7167U — the Core i3-7167U supports 100.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7167U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z3740) vs 12 (Core i3-7167U) — the Core i3-7167U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Atom Z3740	Core i3-7167U
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1066	DDR4-2133+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z3740) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7167U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom Z3740) and Iris Plus Graphics 650 (Core i3-7167U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7167U targets Mobile.

Feature	Atom Z3740	Core i3-7167U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	Iris Plus Graphics 650
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Mobile