Atom Z3770 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Atom Z3770 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Performance Spectrum

Atom Z3770

4 / 4

1,189

+0.4%

Atom E3827

Celeron B820

Celeron P4505

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

1,184

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3770 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3770 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3770

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 512W, a 504W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Turion 64 X2 TL-50 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,184 vs 1,189).
❌6300% higher power demand at 512W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3770 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z3770 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-50?

Yes. Atom Z3770 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom Z3770 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z3770 still makes the most sense overall. Atom Z3770 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z3770 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom Z3770 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3770

The Atom Z3770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.39 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $37.

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 17 May 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Taylor (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $154.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z3770 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom Z3770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.39 GHz on the Atom Z3770 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 — a 39.6% clock advantage for the Atom Z3770. The Atom Z3770 uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses Taylor (2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3770 scores 1,189 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-50's 1,184 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom Z3770.

Feature	Atom Z3770	Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.39 GHz+49%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.46 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	22 nm-76%	90 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)	Taylor (2006)
PassMark	1,189	1,184

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3770 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.