Atom Z670 vs Core Solo T1300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z670 vs Core Solo T1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z670 vs Core Solo T1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z670

2011

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 600, while Core Solo T1300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Solo T1300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (375 vs 385).
❌50% higher power demand at 3W vs 2W.

Core Solo T1300

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 3W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Atom Z670 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z670 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Solo T1300 better than Atom Z670?

Yes. Core Solo T1300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Solo T1300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Solo T1300 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $209 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z670 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom Z670 vs Core Solo T1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z670

The Atom Z670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Lincroft (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: T-PBGA518. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $75.

Core Solo T1300

The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z670 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core Solo T1300's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Atom Z670 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 — a 10.1% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1300 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.66 GHz). The Atom Z670 uses the Lincroft (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core Solo T1300 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z670 scores 375 against the Core Solo T1300's 385 — a 2.6% lead for the Core Solo T1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom Z670	Core Solo T1300
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	1.66 GHz+11%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	1.66 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Lincroft (2010−2011)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	375	385+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z670 uses the T-PBGA518 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Solo T1300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.