Atom Z670
VS
Sempron 3100+

Atom Z670 vs Sempron 3100+

Intel

Atom Z670

1 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Sempron 3100+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom Z670 is positioned at rank 1095 and the Sempron 3100+ is on rank 1068, so the Sempron 3100+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z670

#1083
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3128%
#1084
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3082%
#1085
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2829%
#1086
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2817%
#1087
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2791%
#1089
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2695%
#1090
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2584%
#1091
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2580%
#1092
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2511%
#1095
Atom Z670
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
99%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3100+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
54496%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
51493%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
37388%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
11263%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
8922%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
7805%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4470%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4412%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
4017%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
4017%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3972%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3865%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3811%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3795%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3761%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
100%
#1069
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
98%
#1070
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
98%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
94%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
87%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
86%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
83%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
81%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
75%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
71%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
70%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
69%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
69%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
67%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
63%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom Z670 (2011) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR2, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom Z670Sempron 3100+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lincroft (2010−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Sempron 3100+ (2001) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom Z670Sempron 3100+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom Z670 and Sempron 3100+

Intel

Atom Z670

The Atom Z670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Lincroft (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: T-PBGA518. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $75.

AMD

Sempron 3100+

The Sempron 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

The Atom Z670 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 3100+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Atom Z670 versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3100+ — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Sempron 3100+. The Atom Z670 uses the Lincroft (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron 3100+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z670 scores 375 against the Sempron 3100+'s 372 — a 0.8% lead for the Atom Z670. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom Z670Sempron 3100+
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
1.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256 kB
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
Lincroft (2010−2011)
Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark
375
372
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z670 uses the T-PBGA518 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3100+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Atom Z670 versus DDR 400 MHz on the Sempron 3100+ — the Sempron 3100+ supports 198% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Sempron 3100+ supports up to 3 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel SM35 (Atom Z670) and nForce3,VIA K8T800 (Sempron 3100+).

FeatureAtom Z670Sempron 3100+
Socket
T-PBGA518
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR 400 MHz+19900%
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
3 GB+50%
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z670) / false (Sempron 3100+). The Atom Z670 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 600), while the Sempron 3100+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Sempron 3100+ targets Budget.

FeatureAtom Z670Sempron 3100+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
Target Use
Budget