Atom Z670
VS
Sempron 3000+

Atom Z670 vs Sempron 3000+

Intel

Atom Z670

1 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Sempron 3000+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom Z670 is positioned at rank 1095 and the Sempron 3000+ is on rank 971, so the Sempron 3000+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z670

#1083
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3128%
#1084
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3082%
#1085
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2829%
#1086
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2817%
#1087
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2791%
#1089
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2695%
#1090
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2584%
#1091
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2580%
#1092
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2511%
#1095
Atom Z670
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
99%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3000+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26711%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
25239%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18326%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5521%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4373%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3826%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2191%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2162%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1969%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1969%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1947%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1894%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1868%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1860%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1843%
#971
Sempron 3000+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
99%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
99%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
99%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
97%
#976
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
96%
#977
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
96%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
94%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
94%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
94%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
94%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
93%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
93%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
93%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
92%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom Z670 (2011) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR2, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom Z670Sempron 3000+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lincroft (2010−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Sempron 3000+ (2005) relies on 130 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom Z670Sempron 3000+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom Z670 and Sempron 3000+

Intel

Atom Z670

The Atom Z670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Lincroft (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: T-PBGA518. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $75.

AMD

Sempron 3000+

The Sempron 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 350 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Atom Z670 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 3000+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Atom Z670 versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3000+ — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Sempron 3000+. The Atom Z670 uses the Lincroft (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron 3000+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z670 scores 375 against the Sempron 3000+'s 350 — a 6.9% lead for the Atom Z670. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom Z670Sempron 3000+
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
1.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+300%
128 kB
Process
45 nm-65%
130 nm
Architecture
Lincroft (2010−2011)
Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark
375+7%
350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z670 uses the T-PBGA518 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3000+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom Z670Sempron 3000+
Socket
T-PBGA518
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom Z670 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 600), while the Sempron 3000+ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom Z670Sempron 3000+
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 600