Atom Z670 vs Sempron 3000+

Atom Z670 vs Sempron 3000+ Performance Spectrum

Atom Z670

1 / 2

375

+7.1%

350

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z670 vs Sempron 3000+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z670 vs Sempron 3000+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z670

2011

Why buy it

✅+7.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 62W, a 59W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 600, while Sempron 3000+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Sempron 3000+

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (350 vs 375).
❌1966.7% higher power demand at 62W vs 3W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z670 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z670 better than Sempron 3000+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron 3000+ is ahead with 20% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z670 pulls ahead with 7.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z670 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z670 still makes the most sense overall. Atom Z670 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 7.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z670 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom Z670 vs Sempron 3000+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z670

The Atom Z670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Lincroft (2010−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: T-PBGA518. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $75.

Sempron 3000+

The Sempron 3000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 350 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z670 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Sempron 3000+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Atom Z670 versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3000+ — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Sempron 3000+. The Atom Z670 uses the Lincroft (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Sempron 3000+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z670 scores 375 against the Sempron 3000+'s 350 — a 6.9% lead for the Atom Z670. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom Z670	Sempron 3000+
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	1.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+300%	128 kB
Process	45 nm-65%	130 nm
Architecture	Lincroft (2010−2011)	Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark	375+7%	350

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z670 uses the T-PBGA518 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3000+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.