C-30
VS
Athlon XP 1700+

C-30 vs Athlon XP 1700+

AMD

C-30

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Athlon XP 1700+

1 Cores1 Thrd64 WWMax: 1.47 GHz2001

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The C-30 is positioned at rank 1226 and the Athlon XP 1700+ is on rank 1122, so the Athlon XP 1700+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar C-30

#1214
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
7299%
#1215
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
7192%
#1216
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
6602%
#1217
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
6572%
#1218
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
6512%
#1220
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
6289%
#1221
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
6030%
#1222
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
6020%
#1223
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
5858%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#1228
Core i7-620UM
MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A
98%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
94%
#1231
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
83%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
70%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
59%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
53%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
51%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
50%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
46%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
42%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 1700+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
278317%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
262982%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
190946%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
57524%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
45565%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
39861%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
22830%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
22532%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
20516%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
20514%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
20285%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
19737%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
19462%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
19383%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
19207%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
100%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
98%
#1124
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
92%
#1125
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
90%
#1126
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
87%
#1127
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
86%
#1128
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
81%
#1129
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
81%
#1130
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
81%
#1131
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
79%
#1132
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
79%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
75%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
74%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
72%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
66%
#1137
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
62%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The C-30 (2011) utilizes 40 nm technology and **DDR3 Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightC-30Athlon XP 1700+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ontario (2011−2012) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Thoroughbred (2001−2002) / 180 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon XP 1700+ (2001) relies on 180 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightC-30Athlon XP 1700+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+5%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of C-30 and Athlon XP 1700+

AMD

C-30

The C-30 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 201 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon XP 1700+

The Athlon XP 1700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 64 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 212 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the C-30 and Athlon XP 1700+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the C-30 versus 1.47 GHz on the Athlon XP 1700+ — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 1700+. The C-30 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Athlon XP 1700+ uses Thoroughbred (2001−2002) (180 nm). In PassMark, the C-30 scores 201 against the Athlon XP 1700+'s 212 — a 5.3% lead for the Athlon XP 1700+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureC-30Athlon XP 1700+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
1.47 GHz+23%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB
Process
40 nm-78%
180 nm
Architecture
Ontario (2011−2012)
Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
PassMark
201
212+5%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-30 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon XP 1700+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-30 versus DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 1700+ — the C-30 supports -204.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (C-30) vs 0 (Athlon XP 1700+) — the C-30 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA413 (C-30) and AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 1700+).

FeatureC-30Athlon XP 1700+
Socket
FT1
A
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR-266
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The C-30 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Athlon XP 1700+ requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureC-30Athlon XP 1700+
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6250
💰

Value Analysis

The C-30 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Athlon XP 1700+ debuted at $190. At current prices ($15 vs $15), the Athlon XP 1700+ is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the C-30 delivers 13.4 pts/$ vs 14.1 pts/$ for the Athlon XP 1700+ — making the Athlon XP 1700+ the 5.3% better value option.

FeatureC-30Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP
$50-74%
$190
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$15
Performance per Dollar
13.4
14.1+5%
Release Date
2011
2001