C-30
Pentium III 1400
C-30 vs Pentium III 1400 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
C-30 vs Pentium III 1400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
C-30 vs Pentium III 1400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
C-30
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 340.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.0 vs 0.9 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6250, while Pentium III 1400 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium III 1400 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (201 vs 228).
- ❌1551.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 31W.
Pentium III 1400
2001Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 31W instead of 512W, a 481W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 4.0 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while C-30 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium III 1400 better than C-30?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
C-30 vs Pentium III 1400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
C-30
The C-30 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 201 points. Launch price was $69.
Pentium III 1400
The Pentium III 1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tualatin (2000−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA370. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 228 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the C-30 and Pentium III 1400 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the C-30 versus 1.4 GHz on the Pentium III 1400 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Pentium III 1400. The C-30 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium III 1400 uses Tualatin (2000−2002) (130 nm). In PassMark, the C-30 scores 201 against the Pentium III 1400's 228 — a 12.6% lead for the Pentium III 1400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | C-30 | Pentium III 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | 1.4 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB |
| Process | 40 nm-69% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Ontario (2011−2012) | Tualatin (2000−2002) |
| PassMark | 201 | 228+13% |
Memory & Platform
The C-30 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium III 1400 uses PGA370 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | C-30 | Pentium III 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT1 | PGA370 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
The C-30 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Pentium III 1400 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | C-30 | Pentium III 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6250 | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the C-30 was priced at $50, while the Pentium III 1400 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($50 vs $250), C-30 was $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the C-30 delivers 4.0 pts/$ vs 0.9 pts/$ for the Pentium III 1400 — making the C-30 the 126% better value option.
| Feature | C-30 | Pentium III 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-80% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.0+344% | 0.9 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2001 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on C-30 and Pentium III 1400
