C-30 vs Pentium III 1200

AMD

C-30

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium III 1200

1 Cores1 Thrd30 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······

C-30 vs Pentium III 1200 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-30 vs Pentium III 1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-30

2011

Why buy it

  • +3.1% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 312.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.0 vs 1.0 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6250, while Pentium III 1200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 1606.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 30W.

Pentium III 1200

2001

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 512W, a 482W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (195 vs 201).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 4.0 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while C-30 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is C-30 better than Pentium III 1200?
Yes. C-30 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3.1% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, C-30 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
C-30 is the better buy right now. C-30 comes in $150 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $200 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.1% higher PassMark. It is also 312.3% better value on MSRP (4.0 vs 1.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
C-30 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

C-30 vs Pentium III 1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

C-30

The C-30 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 201 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium III 1200

The Pentium III 1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tualatin (2000−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA370. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the C-30 and Pentium III 1200 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the C-30 versus 1.2 GHz on the Pentium III 1200 — identical boost frequencies. The C-30 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium III 1200 uses Tualatin (2000−2002) (130 nm). In PassMark, the C-30 scores 201 against the Pentium III 1200's 195 — a 3% lead for the C-30. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureC-30Pentium III 1200
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB
Process
40 nm-69%
130 nm
Architecture
Ontario (2011−2012)
Tualatin (2000−2002)
PassMark
201+3%
195
🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-30 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium III 1200 uses PGA370 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-30 versus SDR-133 on the Pentium III 1200 — the C-30 supports -901.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The C-30 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 512 MB 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (C-30) vs 0 (Pentium III 1200) — the C-30 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureC-30Pentium III 1200
Socket
FT1
PGA370
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
SDR-133
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
512 MB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
4
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (C-30) / None (Pentium III 1200). The C-30 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Pentium III 1200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium III 1200 targets Legacy.

FeatureC-30Pentium III 1200
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6250
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the C-30 was priced at $50, while the Pentium III 1200 came in at $200. On launch pricing ($50 vs $200), C-30 was $150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the C-30 delivers 4.0 pts/$ vs 1.0 pts/$ for the Pentium III 1200 — making the C-30 the 121.9% better value option.

FeatureC-30Pentium III 1200
MSRP
$50-75%
$200
Performance per Dollar
4.0+300%
1.0
Release Date
2011
2001

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.