Celeron 1007U
VS
A4-6250J

Celeron 1007U vs A4-6250J

Intel

Celeron 1007U

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A4-6250J

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1007U is positioned at rank 99 and the A4-6250J is on rank 643, so the Celeron 1007U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1007U

#87
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
273%
#88
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
269%
#89
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
247%
#90
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
246%
#91
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
244%
#93
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
236%
#94
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
226%
#95
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
225%
#96
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
219%
#99
Celeron 1007U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#102
N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
100%
#106
Ryzen 5 2500U
MSRP: $349|Avg: N/A
98%
#109
Celeron 4305U
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#110
Celeron J1850
MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A
96%
#114
Core i3-4100M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $99
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-6250J

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11554%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10917%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7927%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2388%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1892%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1655%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
948%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
935%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
852%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
852%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
842%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
819%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
808%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
805%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
797%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
97%
#643
A4-6250J
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
99%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
98%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A4-6250J delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 1007U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 1007UA4-6250J
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 1007UA4-6250J
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1007U and A4-6250J

Intel

Celeron 1007U

The Celeron 1007U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,610 points. Launch price was $86.

AMD

A4-6250J

The A4-6250J is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,619 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Celeron 1007U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A4-6250J offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A4-6250J has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 1007U versus 2 GHz on the A4-6250J — a 28.6% clock advantage for the A4-6250J. The Celeron 1007U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the A4-6250J uses Beema (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1007U scores 1,610 against the A4-6250J's 1,619 — a 0.6% lead for the A4-6250J.

FeatureCeleron 1007UA4-6250J
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2 GHz+33%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Beema (2014)
PassMark
1,610
1,619
Geekbench 6 Single
208
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1007U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A4-6250J uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Celeron 1007U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 1007U) vs 1 (A4-6250J). PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1007U) vs 8 (A4-6250J) — the Celeron 1007U offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCeleron 1007UA4-6250J
Socket
BGA1023
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1007U) / AMD-V (A4-6250J). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1007U) and Radeon R3 (A4-6250J) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6250J targets Entry Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6250J rivals Pentium J2900.

FeatureCeleron 1007UA4-6250J
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Radeon R3
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Entry Desktop