Celeron 1007U
VS
Phenom II X3 720

Celeron 1007U vs Phenom II X3 720

Intel

Celeron 1007U

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Phenom II X3 720

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1007U is positioned at rank 99 and the Phenom II X3 720 is on rank 957, so the Celeron 1007U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1007U

#87
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
273%
#88
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
269%
#89
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
247%
#90
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
246%
#91
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
244%
#93
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
236%
#94
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
226%
#95
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
225%
#96
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
219%
#99
Celeron 1007U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#102
N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
100%
#106
Ryzen 5 2500U
MSRP: $349|Avg: N/A
98%
#109
Celeron 4305U
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#110
Celeron J1850
MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A
96%
#114
Core i3-4100M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $99
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X3 720

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
25322%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
23927%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17373%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5234%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4146%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3627%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2077%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2050%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1867%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1866%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1846%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1796%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1771%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1764%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1748%
#957
Phenom II X3 720
MSRP: $130|Avg: $64
100%
#958
Pentium E6300
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
100%
#959
Core i5-661
MSRP: $196|Avg: $40
99%
#960
Core i5-750
MSRP: $210|Avg: $30
98%
#961
Core i3-4150
MSRP: $281|Avg: $70
98%
#962
Core i3-2100T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $127
98%
#963
Pentium E2210
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
97%
#964
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
97%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
96%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
96%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
95%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
95%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
95%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
95%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom II X3 720 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1007U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 1007UPhenom II X3 720
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($64)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Heka (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 1007UPhenom II X3 720
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($64)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1007U and Phenom II X3 720

Intel

Celeron 1007U

The Celeron 1007U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,610 points. Launch price was $86.

AMD

Phenom II X3 720

The Phenom II X3 720 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

The Celeron 1007U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X3 720 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom II X3 720 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 1007U versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X3 720 — a 60.5% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 720 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 1007U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X3 720 uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1007U scores 1,610 against the Phenom II X3 720's 1,600 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 1007U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1007U vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 720.

FeatureCeleron 1007UPhenom II X3 720
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2.8 GHz+87%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2.8 GHz+87%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Heka (2009−2010)
PassMark
1,610
1,600
Geekbench 6 Single
380
Geekbench 6 Multi
980
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1007U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X3 720 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Celeron 1007U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1023 (Celeron 1007U) and AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 720).

FeatureCeleron 1007UPhenom II X3 720
Socket
BGA1023
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1007U) / AMD-V (Phenom II X3 720). The Celeron 1007U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Phenom II X3 720 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Phenom II X3 720 targets Legacy Desktop.

FeatureCeleron 1007UPhenom II X3 720
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop