Celeron 1007U vs Pentium Dual Core T2370

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1007U vs Pentium Dual Core T2370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1007U vs Pentium Dual Core T2370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1007U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium Dual Core T2370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1600% higher power demand at 17W vs 1W.

Pentium Dual Core T2370

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 17W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,601 vs 1,610).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron 1007U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1007U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual Core T2370 better than Celeron 1007U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium Dual Core T2370 is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1007U pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1007U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual Core T2370 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual Core T2370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 1007U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1007U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1007U vs Pentium Dual Core T2370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1007U

The Celeron 1007U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,610 points. Launch price was $86.

Pentium Dual Core T2370

The Pentium Dual Core T2370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.73 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,601 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1007U and Pentium Dual Core T2370 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 1007U versus 1.73 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2370 — a 14.2% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual Core T2370. The Celeron 1007U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T2370 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1007U scores 1,610 against the Pentium Dual Core T2370's 1,601 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 1007U.

Feature	Celeron 1007U	Pentium Dual Core T2370
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	1.73 GHz+15%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,610	1,601

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1007U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T2370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1007U versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium Dual Core T2370 — the Celeron 1007U supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1007U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1007U) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T2370) — the Celeron 1007U offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron 1007U	Pentium Dual Core T2370
Socket	BGA1023	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+140%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1007U) / No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T2370). The Celeron 1007U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium Dual Core T2370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium Dual Core T2370 targets Mobile.