Celeron 1007U vs Celeron G1820T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1007U vs Celeron G1820T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1007U vs Celeron G1820T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1007U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 54W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Celeron G1820T

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,599 vs 1,610).
❌217.6% higher power demand at 54W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1007U better than Celeron G1820T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1820T is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1007U pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Celeron G1820T also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1007U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1007U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 1007U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1007U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1007U vs Celeron G1820T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1007U

The Celeron 1007U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,610 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron G1820T

The Celeron G1820T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,599 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1007U and Celeron G1820T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 1007U versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1820T — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820T (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron 1007U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G1820T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1007U scores 1,610 against the Celeron G1820T's 1,599 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 1007U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1007U vs 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820T.

Feature	Celeron 1007U	Celeron G1820T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.4 GHz+60%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,610	1,599
Geekbench 6 Single	—	415
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	629

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1007U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1820T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1007U versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820T — the Celeron 1007U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1023 (Celeron 1007U) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820T).

Feature	Celeron 1007U	Celeron G1820T
Socket	BGA1023	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1007U) / VT-x (Celeron G1820T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1007U) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820T rivals Pentium G3220T.