Celeron 1019Y vs Core 2 Duo E7200

CPU

GPU

Celeron 1019Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Core 2 Duo E7200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron 1019Y

2 / 2

1,005

+0.3%

1,002

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1019Y is positioned at rank 441 and the Core 2 Duo E7200 is on rank 1040, so the Celeron 1019Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1019Y

#429

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

584%

#430

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

575%

#431

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

528%

#432

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

526%

#433

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

521%

#435

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

503%

#436

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

482%

#437

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

482%

#438

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

469%

#441

Celeron 1019Y

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7200

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

41396%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

39116%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

28401%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

8556%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

6777%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

5929%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

3396%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

3351%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

3052%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

3051%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

3017%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

2936%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

2895%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

2883%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

2857%

#1039

Athlon II X4 638

MSRP: $300|Avg: $280

100%

#1040

Core 2 Duo E7200

MSRP: $133|Avg: $133

100%

#1042

Phenom X3 8750

MSRP: $195|Avg: $20

98%

#1043

Pentium G4400TE

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

97%

#1044

Celeron 2.60

MSRP: $53|Avg: $10

96%

#1045

Core i7-990X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $225

95%

#1046

Phenom X4 9750B

MSRP: $215|Avg: $34

94%

#1047

Core 2 Duo E8200

MSRP: $163|Avg: $20

93%

#1048

Core 2 Quad Q9450

MSRP: $316|Avg: $15

93%

#1049

Core 2 Duo E8600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $95

92%

#1050

Core 2 Duo E6320

MSRP: $163|Avg: $5

91%

#1051

Core i7-980X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

91%

#1052

Athlon 64 X2 3600+

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

90%

#1053

Core 2 Duo E6420

MSRP: $183|Avg: $10

90%

#1054

Phenom X4 9600B

MSRP: $278|Avg: $20

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E7200 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1019Y is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Celeron 1019Y	Core 2 Duo E7200
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($133)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Celeron 1019Y	Core 2 Duo E7200
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($133)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron 1019Y Benchmark Check

Core 2 Duo E7200 Benchmark Check

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1019Y and Core 2 Duo E7200

Celeron 1019Y

The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

Core 2 Duo E7200

The Core 2 Duo E7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1019Y and Core 2 Duo E7200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — a 86.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7200 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Celeron 1019Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1019Y scores 1,005 against the Core 2 Duo E7200's 1,002 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 1019Y. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1019Y vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7200.

Feature	Celeron 1019Y	Core 2 Duo E7200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1 GHz	2.53 GHz+153%
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.53 GHz+153%
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	3 MB (total)+500%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,005	1,002
Geekbench 6 Single	—	368
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	666

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1019Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1019Y versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — the Celeron 1019Y supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1019Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM77,UM77,HM76,HM75 (Celeron 1019Y) and P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7200).

Feature	Celeron 1019Y	Core 2 Duo E7200
Socket	BGA1023	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 2 Duo E7200 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron 1019Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1019Y targets Budget, Core 2 Duo E7200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U; Core 2 Duo E7200 rivals Athlon II X2 245.