
Celeron 1019Y

Core 2 Duo E7200
Celeron 1019Y vs Core 2 Duo E7200 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 1019Y vs Core 2 Duo E7200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 1019Y vs Core 2 Duo E7200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 1019Y
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Core 2 Duo E7200 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E7200.
Core 2 Duo E7200
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Celeron 1019Y.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,002 vs 1,005).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $133 MSRP, while Celeron 1019Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1019Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo E7200 better than Celeron 1019Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 1019Y vs Core 2 Duo E7200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1019Y
The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

Core 2 Duo E7200
The Core 2 Duo E7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 1019Y and Core 2 Duo E7200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — a 86.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7200 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Celeron 1019Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1019Y scores 1,005 against the Core 2 Duo E7200's 1,002 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 1019Y. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1019Y vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7200.
| Feature | Celeron 1019Y | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 2.53 GHz+153% |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 2.53 GHz+153% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 3 MB (total)+500% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,005 | 1,002 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 368 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 666 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 1019Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1019Y versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — the Celeron 1019Y supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1019Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM77,UM77,HM76,HM75 (Celeron 1019Y) and P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7200).
| Feature | Celeron 1019Y | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+100% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 2 Duo E7200 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron 1019Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1019Y targets Budget, Core 2 Duo E7200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U; Core 2 Duo E7200 rivals Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | Celeron 1019Y | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













