Celeron 1019Y vs Core 2 Duo E7200

Intel

Celeron 1019Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E7200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 1019Y vs Core 2 Duo E7200 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1019Y vs Core 2 Duo E7200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1019Y vs Core 2 Duo E7200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1019Y

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Core 2 Duo E7200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E7200.

Core 2 Duo E7200

2008

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Celeron 1019Y.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,002 vs 1,005).
  • Launch MSRP is still $133 MSRP, while Celeron 1019Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1019Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E7200 better than Celeron 1019Y?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E7200 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1019Y pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1019Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 2 Duo E7200 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo E7200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $133 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 1019Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 1019Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1019Y vs Core 2 Duo E7200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron 1019Y

The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E7200

The Core 2 Duo E7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1019Y and Core 2 Duo E7200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — a 86.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7200 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Celeron 1019Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1019Y scores 1,005 against the Core 2 Duo E7200's 1,002 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 1019Y. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1019Y vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7200.

FeatureCeleron 1019YCore 2 Duo E7200
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1 GHz
2.53 GHz+153%
Base Clock
1 GHz
2.53 GHz+153%
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
3 MB (total)+500%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,005
1,002
Geekbench 6 Single
368
Geekbench 6 Multi
666
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1019Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1019Y versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — the Celeron 1019Y supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1019Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM77,UM77,HM76,HM75 (Celeron 1019Y) and P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7200).

FeatureCeleron 1019YCore 2 Duo E7200
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600+100%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 2 Duo E7200 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron 1019Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1019Y targets Budget, Core 2 Duo E7200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U; Core 2 Duo E7200 rivals Athlon II X2 245.

FeatureCeleron 1019YCore 2 Duo E7200
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Legacy Desktop