Celeron 1019Y
VS
E1-6010

Celeron 1019Y vs E1-6010

Intel

Celeron 1019Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1 GHz2013
VS
AMD

E1-6010

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.35 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1019Y is positioned at rank 441 and the E1-6010 is on rank 878, so the Celeron 1019Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1019Y

#429
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
584%
#430
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
575%
#431
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
528%
#432
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
526%
#433
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
521%
#435
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
503%
#436
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
482%
#437
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
482%
#438
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
469%
#441
Celeron 1019Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E1-6010

#866
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1458%
#867
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1437%
#868
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1319%
#869
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1313%
#870
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1301%
#872
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1256%
#873
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1205%
#874
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1203%
#875
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1170%
#878
E1-6010
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
100%
#881
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
98%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
98%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
97%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The E1-6010 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 1019Y in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 1019YE1-6010
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 1019YE1-6010
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1019Y and E1-6010

Intel

Celeron 1019Y

The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

AMD

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1019Y and E1-6010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y versus 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the E1-6010. The Celeron 1019Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the E1-6010 uses Beema (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1019Y scores 1,005 against the E1-6010's 1,006 — a 0.1% lead for the E1-6010.

FeatureCeleron 1019YE1-6010
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1 GHz
1.35 GHz+35%
Base Clock
1 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1024 kB+100%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Beema (2014)
PassMark
1,005
1,006
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1019Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E1-6010 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 1019YE1-6010
Socket
BGA1023
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1019Y) / not specified (E1-6010). The Celeron 1019Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the E1-6010 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1019Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureCeleron 1019YE1-6010
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget