Celeron 1019Y vs Core i3-3229Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1019Y vs Core i3-3229Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1019Y vs Core i3-3229Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1019Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,005 vs 1,014).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Core i3-3229Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3229Y better than Celeron 1019Y?

Yes. Core i3-3229Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.9% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-3229Y has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 40% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3229Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-3229Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-3229Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3229Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1019Y vs Core i3-3229Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1019Y

The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

Core i3-3229Y

The Core i3-3229Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,014 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1019Y packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-3229Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-3229Y — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-3229Y (base: 1 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Celeron 1019Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-3229Y uses Ivy Bridge-Y (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1019Y scores 1,005 against the Core i3-3229Y's 1,014 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-3229Y. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1019Y vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3229Y.

Feature	Celeron 1019Y	Core i3-3229Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1 GHz	1.4 GHz+40%
Base Clock	1 GHz	1.4 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Ivy Bridge-Y (2013)
PassMark	1,005	1,014
Geekbench 6 Single	—	350
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	657

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the BGA1023 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM77,UM77,HM76,HM75 (Celeron 1019Y) and HM77,UM77 (Core i3-3229Y).

Feature	Celeron 1019Y	Core i3-3229Y
Socket	BGA1023	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1019Y) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3229Y). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1019Y) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i3-3229Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1019Y targets Budget, Core i3-3229Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U; Core i3-3229Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050GE.