Celeron 2.10 vs Atom E660

Celeron 2.10

1 Cores1 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2002

Atom E660

1 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron 2.10

1 / 1

285

+3.6%

275

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.10 is positioned at rank 1066 and the Atom E660 is on rank 743, so the Atom E660 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.10

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

53559%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

50608%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

36746%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

11070%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

8769%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

7671%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

4393%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

4336%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

3948%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

3948%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

3904%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

3798%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

3745%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

3730%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

3696%

#1066

Celeron 2.10

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

100%

#1067

Core i7-950

MSRP: $562|Avg: $15

99%

#1068

Sempron 3100+

MSRP: $65|Avg: $15

98%

#1069

Athlon II X4 635

MSRP: $400|Avg: $250

97%

#1070

Core 2 Duo E6750

MSRP: $183|Avg: $15

97%

#1071

Core i7-940

MSRP: $562|Avg: $90

93%

#1072

Celeron 2.40

MSRP: $69|Avg: $13

86%

#1073

Sempron 2800+

MSRP: $65|Avg: $29

85%

#1074

Athlon 64 3100+

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

82%

#1075

Sempron 3600+

MSRP: $105|Avg: $20

79%

#1076

Celeron 2.80

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

74%

#1077

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

MSRP: $450|Avg: $20

70%

#1078

Athlon 64 3600+

MSRP: $149|Avg: $15

69%

#1079

Core 2 Quad Q6700

MSRP: $530|Avg: $50

68%

#1080

Athlon 64 2600+

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

67%

#1081

Celeron 2.20

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

66%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E660

#731

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1067%

#732

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1051%

#733

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

965%

#734

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

961%

#735

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

952%

#737

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

919%

#738

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

881%

#739

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

880%

#740

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

856%

#743

Atom E660

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#744

Pentium 6805

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

100%

#749

Ryzen 3 7320C

MSRP: $299|Avg: $200

100%

#757

Core i7-11370H

MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom E660 (2010) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR2, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron 2.10	Atom E660
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($49)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Tunnel Creek (2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 2.10 (2002) relies on 130 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron 2.10	Atom E660
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($49)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron 2.10 Benchmark Check

Atom E660 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.10 and Atom E660

Celeron 2.10

The Celeron 2.10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 285 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom E660

The Atom E660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Tunnel Creek (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA676. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 275 points. Launch price was $54.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 2.10 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom E660's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Celeron 2.10 versus 1.3 GHz on the Atom E660 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.10. The Celeron 2.10 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom E660 uses Tunnel Creek (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.10 scores 285 against the Atom E660's 275 — a 3.6% lead for the Celeron 2.10. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 2.10	Atom E660
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz+62%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	128 kB	512 kB (per core)+300%
Process	130 nm	45 nm-65%
Architecture	Northwood (2002−2004)	Tunnel Creek (2010)
PassMark	285+4%	275

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2.10 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom E660 uses BGA676 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.10 versus DDR2-800 on the Atom E660 — the Atom E660 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 2.10 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 2.10) vs 4 (Atom E660) — the Atom E660 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 845,850,865 (Celeron 2.10) and Intel FCBGA518 (Atom E660).

Feature	Celeron 2.10	Atom E660
Socket	PGA478	BGA676
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-400	DDR2-800+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 2.10) / not specified (Atom E660). The Atom E660 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 600), while the Celeron 2.10 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2.10 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.10 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.