Celeron 2.10 vs Core i5-13400F
Celeron 2.10
Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 2.10 is positioned at rank #1066 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.10
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 2.10 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($49) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 2.10 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2291%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($49) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.10 and Core i5-13400F
Celeron 2.10
The Celeron 2.10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 285 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Celeron 2.10 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Celeron 2.10 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 74.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Celeron 2.10 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.10 scores 285 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 195.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron 2.10 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Celeron 2.10 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 10 / 16+900% |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 4.6 GHz+119% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 1.25 MB (per core)+900% |
| Process | 130 nm | Intel 7 nm-95% |
| Architecture | Northwood (2002−2004) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 285 | 25,029+8682% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 2.10 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.10 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 133.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron 2.10) vs 2 (Core i5-13400F). PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 2.10) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 845,850,865 (Celeron 2.10) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Celeron 2.10 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 5.0+355% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-400 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+400% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 192 GB+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 2.10) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Celeron 2.10 targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.10 rivals Pentium 4 2.40; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Celeron 2.10 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 2.10 launched at $49 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($49 vs $180), the Celeron 2.10 is $131 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.10 delivers 5.8 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 183.9% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 2.10 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-75% | $196 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-73% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 139.1+2298% |
| Release Date | 2002 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 2.10 and Core i5-13400F
