Celeron 2.40 vs Celeron 2.30
Celeron 2.40
Celeron 2.30
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.40 is positioned at rank 1072 and the Celeron 2.30 is on rank 1092, so the Celeron 2.40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.40
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.30
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 2.40 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($13) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 2.40 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+22%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($13) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.40 and Celeron 2.30
Celeron 2.40
The Celeron 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron 2.30
The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 2.40 and Celeron 2.30 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron 2.40 versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.40. The Celeron 2.40 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 2.30 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.40 scores 345 against the Celeron 2.30's 325 — a 6% lead for the Celeron 2.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+4% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 128 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | NetBurst (2000−2006) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| PassMark | 345+6% | 325 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 150 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR1-333 memory speed. The Celeron 2.30 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 845,Intel 865 (Celeron 2.40) and 845,850,865 (Celeron 2.30).
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-333 | DDR1-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Celeron 2.40) vs No (Celeron 2.30). Primary use case: Celeron 2.40 targets Legacy Desktop, Celeron 2.30 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.40 rivals Pentium 4 2.40; Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | No |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 2.40 launched at $69 MSRP, while the Celeron 2.30 debuted at $100. At current prices ($13 vs $10), the Celeron 2.30 is $3 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.40 delivers 26.5 pts/$ vs 32.5 pts/$ for the Celeron 2.30 — making the Celeron 2.30 the 20.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-31% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $13 | $10-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.5 | 32.5+23% |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2003 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 2.40 and Celeron 2.30
