Celeron 2.40 vs Sempron 3100+
Celeron 2.40
Sempron 3100+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.40 is positioned at rank 1072 and the Sempron 3100+ is on rank 1068, so the Sempron 3100+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.40
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3100+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 2.40 | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($13) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 2.40 | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+7%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($13) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.40 and Sempron 3100+
Celeron 2.40
The Celeron 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.
Sempron 3100+
The Sempron 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $60.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 2.40 and Sempron 3100+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron 2.40 versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3100+ — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.40. The Celeron 2.40 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3100+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.40 scores 345 against the Sempron 3100+'s 372 — a 7.5% lead for the Sempron 3100+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+33% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 256 kB+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | NetBurst (2000−2006) | Palermo (2001−2005) |
| PassMark | 345 | 372+8% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 150 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 2.40 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3100+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-333 on the Celeron 2.40 versus DDR 400 MHz on the Sempron 3100+ — the Sempron 3100+ supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Sempron 3100+ supports up to 3 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 845,Intel 865 (Celeron 2.40) and nForce3,VIA K8T800 (Sempron 3100+).
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | 754 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-333 | DDR 400 MHz+39900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Celeron 2.40) vs false (Sempron 3100+). Primary use case: Celeron 2.40 targets Legacy Desktop, Sempron 3100+ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.40 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | false |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 2.40 launched at $69 MSRP, while the Sempron 3100+ debuted at $65. At current prices ($13 vs $15), the Celeron 2.40 is $2 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.40 delivers 26.5 pts/$ vs 24.8 pts/$ for the Sempron 3100+ — making the Celeron 2.40 the 6.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Sempron 3100+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69 | $65-6% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $13-13% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.5+7% | 24.8 |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2001 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 2.40 and Sempron 3100+
