Celeron 2.40 vs Sempron 3100+

Celeron 2.40 vs Sempron 3100+ Performance Spectrum

Celeron 2.40

1 / 1

345

0.0%

372

+7.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2.40 vs Sempron 3100+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2.40 vs Sempron 3100+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2.40

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (345 vs 372).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $65 MSRP).
❌17.7% higher power demand at 73W vs 62W.

Sempron 3100+

2001

Why buy it

✅+7.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $4 less on MSRP ($65 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 5.0 PassMark/$ ($65 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
✅Draws 62W instead of 73W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 3100+ better than Celeron 2.40?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 2.40 is ahead with 33.3% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3100+ pulls ahead with 7.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3100+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.8% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 3100+ is the better buy right now. Sempron 3100+ comes in $4 cheaper on MSRP at $65 MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you 7.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron 2.40 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 33.3% higher max boost clock. It is also 14.5% better value on MSRP (5.7 vs 5.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2.40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2003 vs 2001). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 2.40 vs Sempron 3100+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2.40

The Celeron 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron 3100+

The Sempron 3100+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 372 points. Launch price was $60.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2.40 and Sempron 3100+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron 2.40 versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3100+ — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.40. The Celeron 2.40 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3100+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.40 scores 345 against the Sempron 3100+'s 372 — a 7.5% lead for the Sempron 3100+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 2.40	Sempron 3100+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+33%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	128 kB	256 kB+100%
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	NetBurst (2000−2006)	Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark	345	372+8%
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	150	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2.40 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 3100+ uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-333 on the Celeron 2.40 versus DDR 400 MHz on the Sempron 3100+ — the Sempron 3100+ supports 20.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Sempron 3100+ supports up to 3 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 845,Intel 865 (Celeron 2.40) and nForce3,VIA K8T800 (Sempron 3100+).

Feature	Celeron 2.40	Sempron 3100+
Socket	PGA478	754
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-333	DDR 400 MHz+20%
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	3 GB+50%
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Celeron 2.40) vs false (Sempron 3100+). Primary use case: Celeron 2.40 targets Legacy Desktop, Sempron 3100+ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.40 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.

Feature	Celeron 2.40	Sempron 3100+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	None	false
Target Use	Legacy Desktop	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 2.40 was priced at $69, while the Sempron 3100+ came in at $65. On launch pricing ($69 vs $65), Sempron 3100+ was $4 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.40 delivers 5.0 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Sempron 3100+ — making the Sempron 3100+ the 13.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 2.40	Sempron 3100+
MSRP	$69	$65-6%
Performance per Dollar	5.0	5.7+14%
Release Date	2003	2001

Search Celeron 2.40 on Amazon

Search Sempron 3100+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.