Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium M 1.50

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium M 1.50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium M 1.50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2.40

2003

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Pentium M 1.50.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (345 vs 375).
❌Launch MSRP is still $69 MSRP, while Pentium M 1.50 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌204.2% higher power demand at 73W vs 24W.

Pentium M 1.50

2003

Why buy it

✅+8.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 24W instead of 73W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron 2.40.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 1.50 better than Celeron 2.40?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 2.40 is ahead with 60% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.50 pulls ahead with 8.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.50 is the stronger fit. You are getting 8.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 1.50 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium M 1.50 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you 8.7% better PassMark. Celeron 2.40 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2003 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (5.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 1.50 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium M 1.50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2.40

The Celeron 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium M 1.50

The Pentium M 1.50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2.40 and Pentium M 1.50 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron 2.40 versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium M 1.50 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.40. The Celeron 2.40 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 1.50 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.40 scores 345 against the Pentium M 1.50's 375 — a 8.3% lead for the Pentium M 1.50. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 2.40	Pentium M 1.50
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+60%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	128 kB	1 MB+700%
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	NetBurst (2000−2006)	Banias (2003)
PassMark	345	375+9%
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	150	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Celeron 2.40	Pentium M 1.50
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-333	—
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Celeron 2.40) / not specified (Pentium M 1.50). Primary use case: Celeron 2.40 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.40 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.