Celeron 2.40
VS
Pentium M 1.50

Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium M 1.50

Intel

Celeron 2.40

1 Cores1 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2003
VS
Intel

Pentium M 1.50

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.40 is positioned at rank 1072 and the Pentium M 1.50 is on rank 227, so the Pentium M 1.50 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.40

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
62343%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
58908%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
42772%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
12885%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
10207%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
8929%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
5114%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
5047%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
4596%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
4595%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
4544%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
4421%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
4359%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
4342%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
4302%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
100%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
98%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
95%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
92%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
86%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
81%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
80%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
79%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
78%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
77%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
72%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
72%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
71%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
69%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
68%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
66%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 1.50

#215
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
391%
#216
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
385%
#217
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
354%
#218
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
352%
#219
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
349%
#221
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
337%
#222
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
323%
#223
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
323%
#224
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
314%
#227
Pentium M 1.50
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 2.40 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium M 1.50 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 8.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 2.40Pentium M 1.50
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($13)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Banias (2003) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 2.40Pentium M 1.50
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($13)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.40 and Pentium M 1.50

Intel

Celeron 2.40

The Celeron 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium M 1.50

The Pentium M 1.50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2.40 and Pentium M 1.50 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron 2.40 versus 1.5 GHz on the Pentium M 1.50 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.40. The Celeron 2.40 uses the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 1.50 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.40 scores 345 against the Pentium M 1.50's 375 — a 8.3% lead for the Pentium M 1.50. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron 2.40Pentium M 1.50
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+60%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
128 kB
1 MB+700%
Process
130 nm
130 nm
Architecture
NetBurst (2000−2006)
Banias (2003)
PassMark
345
375+9%
Geekbench 6 Single
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
150
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

FeatureCeleron 2.40Pentium M 1.50
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR1-333
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Celeron 2.40) / not specified (Pentium M 1.50). Primary use case: Celeron 2.40 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.40 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.

FeatureCeleron 2.40Pentium M 1.50
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Desktop