Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40

Intel

Celeron 2.40

1 Cores1 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium 4 2.40

1 Cores1 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2004
Similar parts
·······

Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2.40

2003

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $124 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
  • Delivers 196.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 1.7 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
  • Draws 73W instead of 110W, a 37W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Pentium 4 2.40.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 4 2.40

2004

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 2.40 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (325 vs 345).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 5.0 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
    • 50.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 73W.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron 2.40.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron 2.40 better than Pentium 4 2.40?
    Yes. Celeron 2.40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Celeron 2.40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2.40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron 2.40 is the better buy right now. Celeron 2.40 comes in $124 cheaper on MSRP at $69 MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 196.9% better value on MSRP (5.0 vs 1.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium 4 2.40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2004 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron 2.40

    The Celeron 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Pentium 4 2.40

    The Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Celeron 2.40 and Pentium 4 2.40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron 2.40 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.40 — identical boost frequencies. Both are built on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture using a 130 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron 2.40 scores 345 against the Pentium 4 2.40's 325 — a 6% lead for the Celeron 2.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureCeleron 2.40Pentium 4 2.40
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2.4 GHz
    2.4 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    128 kB
    1 MB+700%
    Process
    130 nm
    90 nm-31%
    Architecture
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    NetBurst (2000−2006)
    PassMark
    345+6%
    325
    Geekbench 6 Single
    150
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    150
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-333 on the Celeron 2.40 versus 400 on the Pentium 4 2.40 — the Pentium 4 2.40 supports 20.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium 4 2.40 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Intel 845,Intel 865 (Celeron 2.40) and Socket 478 (Pentium 4 2.40).

    FeatureCeleron 2.40Pentium 4 2.40
    Socket
    PGA478
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR1-333
    400+20%
    Max RAM Capacity
    2 GB
    4 GB+100%
    RAM Channels
    1
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization support: None (Celeron 2.40) vs false (Pentium 4 2.40). Primary use case: Celeron 2.40 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.40 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.

    FeatureCeleron 2.40Pentium 4 2.40
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    None
    false
    Target Use
    Legacy Desktop
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Celeron 2.40 was priced at $69, while the Pentium 4 2.40 came in at $193. On launch pricing ($69 vs $193), Celeron 2.40 was $124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.40 delivers 5.0 pts/$ vs 1.7 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 2.40 — making the Celeron 2.40 the 99.2% better value option.

    FeatureCeleron 2.40Pentium 4 2.40
    MSRP
    $69-64%
    $193
    Performance per Dollar
    5.0+194%
    1.7
    Release Date
    2003
    2004

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.