
Celeron 2.40

Pentium 4 2.40
Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 2.40
2003Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $124 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 196.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 1.7 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 73W instead of 110W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Pentium 4 2.40.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Pentium 4 2.40
2004Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 2.40 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (325 vs 345).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 5.0 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
- ❌50.7% higher power demand at 110W vs 73W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron 2.40.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron 2.40 better than Pentium 4 2.40?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 2.40 vs Pentium 4 2.40 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2.40
The Celeron 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium 4 2.40
The Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 2.40 and Pentium 4 2.40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron 2.40 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.40 — identical boost frequencies. Both are built on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture using a 130 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron 2.40 scores 345 against the Pentium 4 2.40's 325 — a 6% lead for the Celeron 2.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Pentium 4 2.40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 1 MB+700% |
| Process | 130 nm | 90 nm-31% |
| Architecture | NetBurst (2000−2006) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 345+6% | 325 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 150 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-333 on the Celeron 2.40 versus 400 on the Pentium 4 2.40 — the Pentium 4 2.40 supports 20.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium 4 2.40 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Intel 845,Intel 865 (Celeron 2.40) and Socket 478 (Pentium 4 2.40).
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Pentium 4 2.40 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-333 | 400+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: None (Celeron 2.40) vs false (Pentium 4 2.40). Primary use case: Celeron 2.40 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.40 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Pentium 4 2.40 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | false |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 2.40 was priced at $69, while the Pentium 4 2.40 came in at $193. On launch pricing ($69 vs $193), Celeron 2.40 was $124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.40 delivers 5.0 pts/$ vs 1.7 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 2.40 — making the Celeron 2.40 the 99.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 2.40 | Pentium 4 2.40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-64% | $193 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.0+194% | 1.7 |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2004 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














