Celeron 2.70 vs Atom N475
Celeron 2.70
Atom N475
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.70 is positioned at rank 1025 and the Atom N475 is on rank 193, so the Atom N475 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.70
Performance Per Dollar Atom N475
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 2.70 | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($49) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($75) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 2.70 | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+54%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($49) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($75) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.70 and Atom N475
Celeron 2.70
The Celeron 2.70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom N475
The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The Celeron 2.70 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom N475's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron 2.70 versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 — a 38.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.70. The Celeron 2.70 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom N475 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.70 scores 408 against the Atom N475's 405 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 2.70. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+48% | 1.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.83 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 512K (per core)+300% |
| Process | 130 nm | 45 nm-65% |
| Architecture | Northwood (2002−2004) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 408 | 405 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 2.70 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom N475 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.70 versus DDR3-667 on the Atom N475 — the Atom N475 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 2.70 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 845,848,865,875 (Celeron 2.70) and Intel NM10 (Atom N475).
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-400 | DDR3-667+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron 2.70) / not specified (Atom N475). The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron 2.70 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2.70 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.70 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel GMA 3150 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 2.70 launched at $49 MSRP, while the Atom N475 debuted at $75.
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Atom N475 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-35% | $75 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 2.70 and Atom N475
