Celeron 2.80 vs Celeron D 352

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2.80 vs Celeron D 352 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2.80 vs Celeron D 352: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2.80

2003

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 73W instead of 84W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron D 352.

Celeron D 352

2006

Why buy it

✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 4.3 PassMark/$ ($69 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron 2.80.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 2.80 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (418 vs 428).
❌15.1% higher power demand at 84W vs 73W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 2.80 better than Celeron D 352?

Yes. Celeron 2.80 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 2.80 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2.80 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 2.80 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 2.80 comes in 44.9% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $69 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron D 352 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 41.5% better value on paper (6.1 vs 4.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron D 352 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 2.80 vs Celeron D 352 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2.80

The Celeron 2.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2.80 and Celeron D 352 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron 2.80 versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Celeron 2.80 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron D 352 uses Cedar Mill (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.80 scores 428 against the Celeron D 352's 418 — a 2.4% lead for the Celeron 2.80. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 2.80	Celeron D 352
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+14%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	128 kB	512 kB+300%
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	Northwood (2002−2004)	Cedar Mill (2006)
PassMark	428+2%	418
Geekbench 6 Single	—	180

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2.80 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron D 352 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.80 versus 800 on the Celeron D 352 — the Celeron D 352 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron 2.80) vs 2 (Celeron D 352). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 845,848,865,875 (Celeron 2.80) and 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352).

Feature	Celeron 2.80	Celeron D 352
Socket	PGA478	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR1-400	800+100%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 2.80) vs false (Celeron D 352). Primary use case: Celeron 2.80 targets Budget, Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.80 rivals Pentium 4 2.80; Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Celeron 2.80	Celeron D 352
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	false
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 2.80 was priced at $100, while the Celeron D 352 came in at $69. On launch pricing ($100 vs $69), Celeron D 352 was $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.80 delivers 4.3 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Celeron D 352 — making the Celeron D 352 the 34.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 2.80	Celeron D 352
MSRP	$100	$69-31%
Performance per Dollar	4.3	6.1+42%
Release Date	2003	2006

Search Celeron 2.80 on Amazon

Search Celeron D 352 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.