Celeron 220 vs Athlon XP 2400+
Celeron 220
Athlon XP 2400+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 220 is positioned at rank 1143 and the Athlon XP 2400+ is on rank 1109, so the Athlon XP 2400+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 220
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2400+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 220 | Athlon XP 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Thorton (2001−2003) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 220 | Athlon XP 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+300%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 220 and Athlon XP 2400+
Celeron 220
The Celeron 220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon XP 2400+
The Athlon XP 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Agosto 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $90.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 220 and Athlon XP 2400+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron 220 versus 2 GHz on the Athlon XP 2400+ — a 50% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2400+. The Celeron 220 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon XP 2400+ uses Thorton (2001−2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 220 scores 320 against the Athlon XP 2400+'s 305 — a 4.8% lead for the Celeron 220. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 220 | Athlon XP 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2 GHz+67% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB |
| Process | 65 nm-50% | 130 nm |
| Architecture | Conroe (2006−2007) | Thorton (2001−2003) |
| PassMark | 320+5% | 305 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 220 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon XP 2400+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 220 versus DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 2400+ — the Celeron 220 supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 945G,G31,G41 (Celeron 220) and AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 2400+).
| Feature | Celeron 220 | Athlon XP 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA479 | A |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR-266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron 220) / not specified (Athlon XP 2400+). Primary use case: Celeron 220 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 220 rivals Athlon 64 3100+.
| Feature | Celeron 220 | Athlon XP 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 220 launched at $42 MSRP, while the Athlon XP 2400+ debuted at $193. At current prices ($42 vs $10), the Athlon XP 2400+ is $32 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 220 delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 30.5 pts/$ for the Athlon XP 2400+ — making the Athlon XP 2400+ the 120% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 220 | Athlon XP 2400+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-78% | $193 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $42 | $10-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | 30.5+301% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2002 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 220 and Athlon XP 2400+
