Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Celeron 220 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40

CPUCPUGPUGPU
Intel

Celeron 220

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2007
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Mobile Sempron SI-40

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2008
Buy on Amazon

Celeron 220 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 220
1 / 1
320
0.0%
brand logoAtom Z500
brand logoPentium III 1266S
brand logoAtom 230
brand logoAtom E660
brand logoCore Ultra 7 268V
brand logoXeon W-3335
brand logoXeon w7-3545
brand logoXeon w9-3575X
Mobile Sempron SI-40
1 / 1
322
+0.6%
brand logoAthlon XP 1700+
brand logoAthlon XP 1900+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoRyzen 5 5600G
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 220 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Celeron 220
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron SI-40
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Celeron 220
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron SI-40
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Celeron 220
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron SI-40
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Celeron 220
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron SI-40
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Celeron 220
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron SI-40
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Civilization VI

Civilization VI

1080P
Celeron 220
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron SI-40
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Dota 2

Dota 2

1080P
Celeron 220
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron SI-40
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

1080P
Celeron 220
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron SI-40
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

1080P
Celeron 220
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron SI-40
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V

Grand Theft Auto V

1080P
Celeron 220
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Sempron SI-40
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Celeron 220 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 220

2007

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (320 vs 322).
    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Mobile Sempron SI-40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Mobile Sempron SI-40

    2008

    Why buy it

      Trade-offs

      • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

      Quick Answers

      So, is Mobile Sempron SI-40 better than Celeron 220?
      Yes. Mobile Sempron SI-40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.6% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
      Which one is better for gaming?
      If gaming is the priority, Mobile Sempron SI-40 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 66.7% higher max boost clock.
      Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
      For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Sempron SI-40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
      Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
      Mobile Sempron SI-40 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Mobile Sempron SI-40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% higher PassMark. Celeron 220 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.
      Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
      Mobile Sempron SI-40 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

      Celeron 220 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40 Technical Specifications

      Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

      Intel

      Celeron 220

      The Celeron 220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $69.

      AMD

      Mobile Sempron SI-40

      The Mobile Sempron SI-40 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Sable (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 322 points. Launch price was $69.

      ⚡

      Processing Power

      Both the Celeron 220 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron 220 versus 2 GHz on the Mobile Sempron SI-40 — a 50% clock advantage for the Mobile Sempron SI-40. The Celeron 220 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Sempron SI-40 uses Sable (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 220 scores 320 against the Mobile Sempron SI-40's 322 — a 0.6% lead for the Mobile Sempron SI-40.

      FeatureCeleron 220Mobile Sempron SI-40
      Cores / Threads
      1 / 1
      1 / 1
      Boost Clock
      1.2 GHz
      2 GHz+67%
      Base Clock
      1.2 GHz
      —
      L3 Cache
      0 kB
      —
      L2 Cache
      512 kB
      512 kB
      Process
      65 nm
      65 nm
      Architecture
      Conroe (2006−2007)
      Sable (2008−2009)
      PassMark
      320
      322
      🧠

      Memory & Platform

      The Celeron 220 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Sempron SI-40 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

      FeatureCeleron 220Mobile Sempron SI-40
      Socket
      BGA479
      S1g2
      PCIe Generation
      PCIe 1.1
      PCIe 2.0+82%
      Max RAM Speed
      DDR2-667
      —
      Max RAM Capacity
      4 GB
      —
      RAM Channels
      1
      —
      ECC Support
      No
      —
      PCIe Lanes
      0
      —
      🔧

      Advanced Features

      Virtualization: No (Celeron 220) / not specified (Mobile Sempron SI-40). Primary use case: Celeron 220 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 220 rivals Athlon 64 3100+.

      FeatureCeleron 220Mobile Sempron SI-40
      Integrated GPU
      No
      —
      Unlocked
      No
      —
      AVX-512
      No
      —
      Virtualization
      No
      —
      Target Use
      Budget
      —