
Celeron 220 vs Ryzen 7 5800X

Celeron 220
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 220 is positioned at rank #1143 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 220
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 5800X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 220 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($42) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 220 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1921%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($42) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 220 and Ryzen 7 5800X

Celeron 220
The Celeron 220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Celeron 220 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron 220 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 118.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Celeron 220 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 220 scores 320 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 195.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron 220 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Celeron 220 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 8 / 16+700% |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz+292% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+217% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-89% |
| Architecture | Conroe (2006−2007) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 320 | 27,712+8560% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 220 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 220 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X — the Ryzen 7 5800X supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron 220) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 5800X). PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 220) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) — the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 945G,G31,G41 (Celeron 220) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | Celeron 220 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA479 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 220) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Celeron 220 targets Budget, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 220 rivals Athlon 64 3100+.
| Feature | Celeron 220 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 220 launched at $42 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800X debuted at $449. At current prices ($42 vs $180), the Celeron 220 is $138 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 220 delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 154.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800X — making the Ryzen 7 5800X the 181.1% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 220 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-91% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $42-77% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | 154.0+1926% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















