Celeron 2961Y vs Core i5-10400F

Intel

Celeron 2961Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Celeron 2961Y vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2961Y vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2961Y vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2961Y

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (1,085 vs 13,029).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
  • ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
  • ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +561.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
  • βœ…33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron 2961Y.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Celeron 2961Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 2961Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Celeron 2961Y?
Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 561.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1100.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 561.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1100.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $160 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 561.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013), 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 2961Y vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron 2961Y

The Celeron 2961Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

⚑

Processing Power

The Celeron 2961Y packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β€” the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 2961Y versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F β€” a 118.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Celeron 2961Y uses the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020βˆ’2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2961Y scores 1,085 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 β€” a 169.3% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2961Y vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.

FeatureCeleron 2961YCore i5-10400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
1.1 GHz
4.3 GHz+291%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2.9 GHz+164%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+500%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013βˆ’2015)
Comet Lake (2020βˆ’2025)
PassMark
1,085
13,029+1101%
Cinebench R23 Multi
β€”
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
β€”
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
β€”
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2961Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 2961Y versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F β€” the Core i5-10400F supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β€” 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 2961Y) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) β€” the Core i5-10400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 2961Y) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).

FeatureCeleron 2961YCore i5-10400F
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR4-2666+67%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
128 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 2961Y) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Celeron 2961Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2961Y targets Budget, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron 2961Y rivals Pentium 2117U; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCeleron 2961YCore i5-10400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
β€”
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Gaming