Celeron 3215U vs Celeron E3200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3215U vs Celeron E3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3215U vs Celeron E3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3215U

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Celeron E3200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (339 vs 340).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Celeron E3200

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,090 vs 1,091).
❌Launch MSRP is still $43 MSRP, while Celeron 3215U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3215U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E3200 better than Celeron 3215U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron E3200 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3215U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3215U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E3200 is the better buy right now. Celeron E3200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $43 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 3215U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3215U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 3215U vs Celeron E3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3215U

The Celeron 3215U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron E3200

The Celeron E3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,090 points. Launch price was $52.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3215U and Celeron E3200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3215U versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E3200 — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Celeron E3200 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron 3215U uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron E3200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3215U scores 1,091 against the Celeron E3200's 1,090 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 3215U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 339 vs 340, a 0.3% lead for the Celeron E3200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3215U vs 0 kB on the Celeron E3200.

Feature	Celeron 3215U	Celeron E3200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	2.4 GHz+41%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.4 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB (total)+100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,091	1,090
Geekbench 6 Single	339	340
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	610

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3215U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E3200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 3215U versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E3200 — the Celeron 3215U supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 3215U) vs 0 (Celeron E3200) — the Celeron 3215U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3215U) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3200).

Feature	Celeron 3215U	Celeron E3200
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+100%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3215U) vs VT-x (Celeron E3200). The Celeron 3215U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Celeron E3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3215U targets Budget, Celeron E3200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3215U rivals Pentium 3825U; Celeron E3200 rivals Pentium E5200.