Celeron 3215U vs Pentium E5700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3215U vs Pentium E5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3215U vs Pentium E5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3215U

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Pentium E5700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,091 vs 1,096).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Pentium E5700

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Celeron 3215U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3215U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5700 better than Celeron 3215U?

Yes. Pentium E5700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E5700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E5700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E5700 is the better buy right now. Pentium E5700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $75 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3215U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3215U vs Pentium E5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3215U

The Celeron 3215U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium E5700

The Pentium E5700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,096 points. Launch price was $110.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3215U and Pentium E5700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3215U versus 3 GHz on the Pentium E5700 — a 55.3% clock advantage for the Pentium E5700 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Celeron 3215U uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E5700 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3215U scores 1,091 against the Pentium E5700's 1,096 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium E5700. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3215U vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5700.

Feature	Celeron 3215U	Pentium E5700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	3 GHz+76%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	3 GHz+76%
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB (total)+300%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,091	1,096
Geekbench 6 Single	339	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3215U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 3215U	Pentium E5700
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3215U) / not specified (Pentium E5700). The Celeron 3215U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Pentium E5700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3215U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3215U rivals Pentium 3825U.