Celeron 3215U vs Core 2 Duo E8335

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3215U vs Core 2 Duo E8335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3215U vs Core 2 Duo E8335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3215U

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Core 2 Duo E8335 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,091 vs 1,094).
❌1063.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 44W.

Core 2 Duo E8335

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 44W instead of 512W, a 468W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Celeron 3215U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3215U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E8335 better than Celeron 3215U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 3215U is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E8335 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E8335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E8335 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo E8335 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron 3215U is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3215U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3215U vs Core 2 Duo E8335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3215U

The Celeron 3215U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $107.

Core 2 Duo E8335

The Core 2 Duo E8335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,094 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3215U and Core 2 Duo E8335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3215U versus 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8335 — a 58.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 3215U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.933 GHz). The Celeron 3215U uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3215U scores 1,091 against the Core 2 Duo E8335's 1,094 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8335.

Feature	Celeron 3215U	Core 2 Duo E8335
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz+83%	0.93 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.933 GHz+73%
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	6 MB (total)+1100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,091	1,094
Geekbench 6 Single	339	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3215U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 3215U	Core 2 Duo E8335
Socket	FCBGA1168	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3215U) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8335). The Celeron 3215U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3215U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3215U rivals Pentium 3825U.