PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3215U vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3215U vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3215U

2015

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,091 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 20 MB).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1168, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +688.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1168 and older memory support.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Celeron 3215U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3215U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron 3215U?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 688.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2194.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 688.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2194.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 688.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1168, 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron 3215U vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3215U

The Celeron 3215U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 3215U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3215U versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 92.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron 3215U uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3215U scores 1,091 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 183.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 339 vs 2,407, a 150.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3215U vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Celeron 3215U	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	4.6 GHz+171%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.5 GHz+47%
L3 Cache	2 MB	20 MB (total)+900%
L2 Cache	512 kB	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	1,091	25,029+2194%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	339	2,407+610%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3215U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 3215U versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 3215U) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3215U) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Celeron 3215U	Core i5-13400F
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+200%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	192 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	20+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Celeron 3215U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3215U targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron 3215U rivals Pentium 3825U; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.