Celeron 3215U
VS
Phenom X3 8250e

Celeron 3215U vs Phenom X3 8250e

Intel

Celeron 3215U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2015
VS
AMD

Phenom X3 8250e

3 Cores3 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3215U is positioned at rank 241 and the Phenom X3 8250e is on rank 538, so the Celeron 3215U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3215U

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#229
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
403%
#230
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
397%
#231
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
365%
#232
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
363%
#233
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
360%
#235
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
348%
#236
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
333%
#237
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
333%
#238
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
324%
#241
Celeron 3215U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X3 8250e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8628%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8152%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5919%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1783%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1412%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1236%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
708%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
698%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
636%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
636%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
629%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
612%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
603%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
601%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
595%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
98%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
96%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
95%
#538
Phenom X3 8250e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
99%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
97%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
97%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
97%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
96%
#548
Core i3-6100
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
95%
#549
Core i3-6300T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
94%
#550
Core i3-6098P
MSRP: $117|Avg: $59
94%
#551
Core i7-7800X
MSRP: $383|Avg: $254
94%
#552
Core i3-7101TE
MSRP: $117|Avg: $60
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 3215U (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 3215UPhenom X3 8250e
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Toliman (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom X3 8250e (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 3215UPhenom X3 8250e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3215U and Phenom X3 8250e

Intel

Celeron 3215U

The Celeron 3215U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,091 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

Phenom X3 8250e

The Phenom X3 8250e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,084 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Celeron 3215U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8250e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8250e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3215U versus 1.9 GHz on the Phenom X3 8250e — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Phenom X3 8250e. The Celeron 3215U uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X3 8250e uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3215U scores 1,091 against the Phenom X3 8250e's 1,084 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 3215U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3215U vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8250e.

FeatureCeleron 3215UPhenom X3 8250e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
1.9 GHz+12%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Toliman (2008)
PassMark
1,091
1,084
Geekbench 6 Single
339
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3215U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X3 8250e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 3215UPhenom X3 8250e
Socket
FCBGA1168
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3215U) / not specified (Phenom X3 8250e). The Celeron 3215U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Phenom X3 8250e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3215U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3215U rivals Pentium 3825U.

FeatureCeleron 3215UPhenom X3 8250e
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget