Celeron 430 vs Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 430 vs Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 430 vs Mobile Pentium 4 3.06: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 430

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 70W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (448 vs 475).
❌Launch MSRP is still $49 MSRP, while Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

2003

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 70W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 better than Celeron 430?

Yes. Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $49 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 430 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (9.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 430 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 430 vs Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 430

The Celeron 430 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $50.

Mobile Pentium 4 3.06

The Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 430 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 430 versus 3.07 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 — a 52.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. The Celeron 430 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 430 scores 448 against the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06's 475 — a 5.9% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 430	Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	3.07 GHz+71%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	448	475+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	226	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 430 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Mobile Pentium 4 3.06 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 430	Mobile Pentium 4 3.06
Socket	LGA775	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 430) / not specified (Mobile Pentium 4 3.06). Primary use case: Celeron 430 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 430 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.