Celeron 430
VS
Sempron LE-1300

Celeron 430 vs Sempron LE-1300

Intel

Celeron 430

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2007
VS
AMD

Sempron LE-1300

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 430 is positioned at rank 1010 and the Sempron LE-1300 is on rank 905, so the Sempron LE-1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 430

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
34104%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
32225%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
23398%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7049%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5583%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4884%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2798%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2761%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2514%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2514%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2486%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2419%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2385%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2375%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2354%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
100%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
99%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
98%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
98%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
97%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
97%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
96%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
95%
#1020
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
95%
#1021
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
95%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
94%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
92%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
92%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron LE-1300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21350%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20174%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14648%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4413%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3495%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3058%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1751%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1728%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1574%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1574%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1556%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1514%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1493%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1487%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1473%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
96%
#905
Sempron LE-1300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#907
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
99%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
99%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
98%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
97%
#913
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
97%
#914
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
97%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
97%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
96%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
96%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron LE-1300 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 430 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 430Sempron LE-1300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sparta (2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 430Sempron LE-1300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 430 and Sempron LE-1300

Intel

Celeron 430

The Celeron 430 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $50.

AMD

Sempron LE-1300

The Sempron LE-1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 438 points. Launch price was $12.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 430 and Sempron LE-1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 430 versus 2.3 GHz on the Sempron LE-1300 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1300. The Celeron 430 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 430 scores 448 against the Sempron LE-1300's 438 — a 2.3% lead for the Celeron 430. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron 430Sempron LE-1300
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz+28%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Sparta (2007)
PassMark
448+2%
438
Geekbench 6 Single
226
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 430 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1300 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 430Sempron LE-1300
Socket
LGA775
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 430) / not specified (Sempron LE-1300). Primary use case: Celeron 430 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 430 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureCeleron 430Sempron LE-1300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget