Celeron 430
VS
Pentium M 730

Celeron 430 vs Pentium M 730

Intel

Celeron 430

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2007
VS
Intel

Pentium M 730

1 Cores1 Thrd27 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 430 is positioned at rank 1010 and the Pentium M 730 is on rank 161, so the Pentium M 730 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 430

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
34104%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
32225%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
23398%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7049%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5583%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4884%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2798%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2761%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2514%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2514%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2486%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2419%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2385%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2375%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2354%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
100%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
99%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
98%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
98%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
97%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
97%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
96%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
95%
#1020
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
95%
#1021
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
95%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
94%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
92%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
92%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 730

#147
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
337%
#148
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
332%
#149
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
305%
#150
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
304%
#151
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
301%
#153
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
291%
#154
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
279%
#155
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
278%
#156
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
271%
#161
Pentium M 730
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#171
Celeron N3060
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#174
Core 2 Duo T9300
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 430 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Pentium M 730 in both compute-intensive tasks (2.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 430Pentium M 730
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 430Pentium M 730
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 430 and Pentium M 730

Intel

Celeron 430

The Celeron 430 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium M 730

The Pentium M 730 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 435 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 430 and Pentium M 730 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 430 versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 730 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Celeron 430 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron 430 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium M 730 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 430 scores 448 against the Pentium M 730's 435 — a 2.9% lead for the Celeron 430. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron 430Pentium M 730
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz+12%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz+12%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
2 MB+300%
Process
65 nm-28%
90 nm
Architecture
Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark
448+3%
435
Geekbench 6 Single
226
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 430 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 730 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 430Pentium M 730
Socket
LGA775
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 430) / not specified (Pentium M 730). Primary use case: Celeron 430 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 430 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureCeleron 430Pentium M 730
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget