Celeron 450 vs Celeron J1750

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 450 vs Celeron J1750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 450 vs Celeron J1750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 450

2008

Why buy it

✅+7.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron J1750 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Celeron J1750 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1750 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron J1750

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Celeron 450 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (250 vs 269).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J1750 better than Celeron 450?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron J1750 is ahead with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 450 pulls ahead with 7.6% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J1750 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron J1750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 450 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (9.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 450 vs Celeron J1750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 450

The Celeron 450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $53.

Celeron J1750

The Celeron J1750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $72.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 450 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron J1750 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 450 versus 2.41 GHz on the Celeron J1750 — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Celeron J1750 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The Celeron 450 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron J1750 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 450 scores 495 against the Celeron J1750's 505 — a 2% lead for the Celeron J1750. Multi-core Geekbench: 269 vs 250 (7.3% advantage for the Celeron 450). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron 450 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1750.

Feature	Celeron 450	Celeron J1750
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.41 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.41 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	22 nm-66%
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	495	505+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	150
Geekbench 6 Multi	269+8%	250

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 450 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron J1750 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron 450 versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1750 — the Celeron J1750 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron J1750 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 450) vs 4 (Celeron J1750) — the Celeron J1750 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 945,G31,G41 (Celeron 450) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1750).

Feature	Celeron 450	Celeron J1750
Socket	LGA775	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3L-1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 450) vs VT-x (Celeron J1750). The Celeron J1750 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Celeron 450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 450 targets Budget, Celeron J1750 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron 450 rivals Pentium 4 2.80; Celeron J1750 rivals Pentium J2850.