Celeron 450 vs Sempron 130

Celeron 450 vs Sempron 130 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 450

1 / 1

495

+1.4%

488

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 450 vs Sempron 130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 450 vs Sempron 130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 450

2008

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Sempron 130 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 130

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (488 vs 495).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 450 better than Sempron 130?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron 130 is ahead with 18.2% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 450 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 450 is the better buy right now. Celeron 450 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $53 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Sempron 130 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 18.2% higher max boost clock. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 130 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 450 vs Sempron 130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 450

The Celeron 450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $53.

Sempron 130

The Sempron 130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 488 points. Launch price was $25.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 450 and Sempron 130 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 450 versus 2.6 GHz on the Sempron 130 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Sempron 130 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron 450 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 130 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 450 scores 495 against the Sempron 130's 488 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron 450. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 450	Sempron 130
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark	495+1%	488
Geekbench 6 Multi	269	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 450 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron 130 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 450	Sempron 130
Socket	LGA775	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 450) / not specified (Sempron 130). Primary use case: Celeron 450 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 450 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.