Celeron 450 vs E1 Micro-6200T

Celeron 450 vs E1 Micro-6200T Performance Spectrum

Celeron 450

1 / 1

495

+4.2%

475

0.0%

Athlon XP 2100+

Athlon XP 2400+

Athlon XP 2700+

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Ryzen 5 8640HS

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 450 vs E1 Micro-6200T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 450 vs E1 Micro-6200T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 450

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while E1 Micro-6200T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.

E1 Micro-6200T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (475 vs 495).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 450 better than E1 Micro-6200T?

Yes. Celeron 450 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 4.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 450 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 57.1% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 450 is the better buy right now. Celeron 450 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $53 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 4.2% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1 Micro-6200T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 450 vs E1 Micro-6200T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 450

The Celeron 450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $53.

E1 Micro-6200T

The E1 Micro-6200T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 450 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the E1 Micro-6200T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E1 Micro-6200T has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 450 versus 1.4 GHz on the E1 Micro-6200T — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 450 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Celeron 450 uses the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the E1 Micro-6200T uses Mullins (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 450 scores 495 against the E1 Micro-6200T's 475 — a 4.1% lead for the Celeron 450.

Feature	Celeron 450	E1 Micro-6200T
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+57%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+120%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	1024 kB+100%
Process	65 nm	28 nm-57%
Architecture	Conroe-L (2007−2008)	Mullins (2014)
PassMark	495+4%	475
Geekbench 6 Multi	269	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 450 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1 Micro-6200T uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 450	E1 Micro-6200T
Socket	LGA775	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 450) / not specified (E1 Micro-6200T). Primary use case: Celeron 450 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 450 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.